Learning from Reflection
In the first lesson, together with Dr. Kelvin Tan, we co-constructed the meaning of reflection. Each one of us was asked to use a word to describe what reflection meant to us. It seemed quite easy but when I actually tried to, I found myself caged in my limited vocabulary. But as the list of words multiplied, we discovered that each one of us came up with a unique word. There were no repeats. Of course, even though Dr Tan mentioned that we could choose words that were already on the board, we felt it necessary to be different from the rest. That’s human nature. The list included the following: Lighthouse, Exploration (Mine), Insights, Soul, Introspection, Mirror, Me, Think, Self-awareness, Perception, Inward, Discovery, Analyze and Elusive (Dr Tan’s). I was thinking about this activity and thought that it was like a mass reflection attempt on reflection. May be one way to aid in reflection is to list out all the possible meanings of what you are going to reflect on and then make use of the list to prompt deeper reflection.
We were then asked to discuss the following questions. What impedes reflection? What enhances reflection? What is a good reflection? What is a poor reflection? Answers were elicited from us and the converse of each answer was also thought of. For example, mere recount was listed as a poor reflection. So the converse which constituted good reflection has to be beyond “mere recount”. This gave us a heightened awareness of what constitutes good or bad reflection. No straight answers were provided but I thought there were hints. Language seemed to be one tool we could use to help us to reflect. Each time we came up with a phrase, Dr Tan would try to use language to find the converse of it. We use adjectives to qualify our statements. We constructed a seemingly comprehensive understanding of reflection. It was metacognition. As a big group it was as if we were doing a collective reflection on reflection with Dr Tan facilitating it.
When we talked about the things that enhances reflection, a list of three in order of difficulty were displayed; Metaphors, Parables and Anecdotes. Then I read palmer's leading from within. In it, Palmer gave an annecdotal parable to illustrate the point that "when you can't get out of it, get into it." I think a parable should be more difficult to write than an anecdote. May be the order should be Metaphors, Anecdotes and Parables. May be it does not matter what the order is.
What is a good reflection? Can there ever be a definite answer? A good Science experiment based on sound principles can be repeated by another to obtain the same results. Will a perceived good reflection by one be able to elicit similar response from others? Are there principles that govern or help us to distinguish the good from the bad? There seem to be certain broad criteria that allows us to do that.
I am very much interested in the effect multiple contexts have on reflection. Is a reflection enhanced or compromised by the existence of multiple audiences that the reflector write for? Writing always serve a purpose. Reflection writing seems to serve the purpose of refining our thoughts. There is at least one presupposed audience in any reflection. Myself. How would it be different when we reflect for ourselves and when we reflect with other audiences in mind? What is the balance between a reflection that is politically correct or naively truthful? Is it possible to reflect for the public without compromising the true value of reflection? I believe it is possible. But I am still searching for a better answer. May be what I need is a better question.
We were then asked to discuss the following questions. What impedes reflection? What enhances reflection? What is a good reflection? What is a poor reflection? Answers were elicited from us and the converse of each answer was also thought of. For example, mere recount was listed as a poor reflection. So the converse which constituted good reflection has to be beyond “mere recount”. This gave us a heightened awareness of what constitutes good or bad reflection. No straight answers were provided but I thought there were hints. Language seemed to be one tool we could use to help us to reflect. Each time we came up with a phrase, Dr Tan would try to use language to find the converse of it. We use adjectives to qualify our statements. We constructed a seemingly comprehensive understanding of reflection. It was metacognition. As a big group it was as if we were doing a collective reflection on reflection with Dr Tan facilitating it.
When we talked about the things that enhances reflection, a list of three in order of difficulty were displayed; Metaphors, Parables and Anecdotes. Then I read palmer's leading from within. In it, Palmer gave an annecdotal parable to illustrate the point that "when you can't get out of it, get into it." I think a parable should be more difficult to write than an anecdote. May be the order should be Metaphors, Anecdotes and Parables. May be it does not matter what the order is.
What is a good reflection? Can there ever be a definite answer? A good Science experiment based on sound principles can be repeated by another to obtain the same results. Will a perceived good reflection by one be able to elicit similar response from others? Are there principles that govern or help us to distinguish the good from the bad? There seem to be certain broad criteria that allows us to do that.
I am very much interested in the effect multiple contexts have on reflection. Is a reflection enhanced or compromised by the existence of multiple audiences that the reflector write for? Writing always serve a purpose. Reflection writing seems to serve the purpose of refining our thoughts. There is at least one presupposed audience in any reflection. Myself. How would it be different when we reflect for ourselves and when we reflect with other audiences in mind? What is the balance between a reflection that is politically correct or naively truthful? Is it possible to reflect for the public without compromising the true value of reflection? I believe it is possible. But I am still searching for a better answer. May be what I need is a better question.
Chris
Labels: DDM Jan 07